STATE IN THE REALITIES OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL ACTS
The article examines and assesses a) the departure of the UN Sixth Committee from the initial installation of the introduction of the Nuremberg principles into the system of international law jus cogens; b) the flawedness of the exclusion of the very possibility of qualifying the behavior of the state as internationally criminal is substantiated; c) the methodologically vulnerable aspects of the study of the topic of state responsibility for international criminal acts in the International Law Commission are indicated and possible ways of overcoming them are proposed.
- Keywords:
- Nuremberg principles
- weak transitivity of guilt in a collectively committed crime
- denazification of Germany as punishment of the Third Reich
- motives for not including the Nuremberg principles in the rank of jus cogens
- gaps in international criminal law
- non-state subjects of an internationally criminal act
- subject - bearer of internationally significant force
Downloadpdf (0.90 MB)
